USPTO serial 75538171
MATOL BIOMUNE OSF PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3225351Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 3, 2007
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MATOL BIOMUNE OSF PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MATOL BIOTECH LABORATORIES LTD.
Lachine, Quebec, H8T 3C5, CA
MATOL BIOTECH LABORATORIES LTD.
Quebec, H9R 6R6, CA
MATOL BIOTECH LABORATORIES LTD.
Quebec, H9R 6R6, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Food supplements containing a formula using a herb, colostrum and whey extract in capsule, powder and tablet form; homeophathic, namely preparations and remedies for humans for relief of the symptoms associated with the common cold, influenza, sinusitis, otitis media and similar conditions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MATOL BIOTECH LABORATORIES LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by MATOL BIOTECH LABORATORIES LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by MATOL BIOTECH LABORATORIES LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named MATOL BIOMUNE OSF PLUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 10, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 30, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |