USPTO serial 75538225
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Sealless magnetically driven plastic and metallic pumps with a thrust balancing feature | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |