Drawing for µPLATFORM

USPTO serial 75538399

µPLATFORM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2503205Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 30, 2001
Examiner
GRUNDY, JUDITH A
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with µPLATFORM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kermit Robinson, Christopher S. Daly, Donald F. Mofford, Judith C. Crowley, Paul D. Durkee, Anthony T. Moosey, Marianne M. Downing

KERMIT ROBINSON, CHRISTOPHER S DALY, DO DALY, CROWLEY, MOFFORD & DURKEE LLP354A TPKE ST STE 301ACANTON, MA 02021-2714UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016printed material, namely, books, newsletters, pamphlets, and brochures featuring diagrams of business models, process flows and implementation methods regarding computer programs and computer hardware integrated in a computing environment and printed and instructional material and educational material featuring diagrams of business models, process flows and implementation methods regarding computer programs and computer hardware integrated in a computing environmentSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2008C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jan 23, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 22, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2001R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jun 1, 2001CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2001IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
May 24, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 25, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2000CNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED—
May 25, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 25, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance