USPTO serial 75538537
LIGHTSHELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIGHTSHELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | ELECTRONIC SPORT SHOOTING SIMULATION APPARATUS, NAMELY, AN IMPACT-TRIGGERED LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE, ADAPTED TO BE LOADED INTO A CONVENTIONAL FIREARM, FOR USE AS AN INTEGRAL COMPONENT IN A SYSTEM FOR SIMULATING THE SPORTS OF SKEET, TRAP AND CLAY PIGEON SHOOTING BY SHOOTING AT STATIONARY OR MOVING TARGETS WITH A BEAM OF LIGHT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 18, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |