USPTO serial 75538723
E FUTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E FUTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
W. Conshohocken, PA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN NETWORK MANAGEMENT; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR COMMERCIAL INTERACTION IN A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR NETWORK SECURITY SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER, SUCH AS PAMPHLETS, BROCHURES, NEWSLETTERS, MAGAZINES, AND SIMILAR PUBLICATIONS ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, RELATING TO COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR COMMERCIAL INTERACTION IN A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | MANAGEMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY RELATED COMPANIES | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 036 | FINANCIAL AND INVESTMENT IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY RELATED COMPANIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |