USPTO serial 75539108
FLAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EHARD, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
22844 Norderstedt, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | COCOA AND COCOA POWDER, NAMELY, INSTANT POWDER AND POWDERED COCOA-BASED BEVERAGES; COCOA PRODUCTS, NAMELY, CHOCOLATE-BASED COMPOUNDS AND COATINGS; CHOCOLATE AND CHOCOLATE GOODS, NAMELY, CHOCOLATE BARS, INCLUDING THOSE CONTAINING FRUIT FILLINGS OR FRUIT SUGAR; AIR-FILLED CHOCOLATE; SWEETS, NAMELY, BAKERY GOODS, ICE CREAM AND CANDY; CANDY, NAMELY, BONBONS FRUIT GUM JELLIES, NOUGAT, AND NOUGAT CANDY-BASED SNACKS; LIQUORICE, CHEWING GUM; CHRISTMAS TREE DECORATIONS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF CHOCOLATE AND CANDY; ADVENT CALENDARS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF CHOCOLATES; CONFECTIONERY, NAMELY, CANDY AND PRALINES; CHOCOLATE COVERED WAFFLES, NAMELY, WAFFLE BISCUITS AND WAFFLE PRALINES; CHOCOLATE BARS, INCLUDING THOSE CONTAINING FRUIT FILLINGS, CHOCOLATE-COVERED SWEETMEATS, NAMELY, CHOCOLATE-COVERED RAISINS, NUTS, ALMONDS AND FRUITS; BAKERY GOODS; CONFECTIONERY, NAMELY, FROZEN CONFECTIONS AND CANDY, BISCUITS, COCOA AND CHOCOLATE-BASED BEVERAGES; AND ALL OF THE ABOVE GOODS ALSO AS SUGAR-FREE GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |