USPTO serial 75539131
SHY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3046484Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 17, 2006
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SHY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PRESTON, WA
SURRY HILLS NSW, AU
SURRY HILLS NSW, AU
SURRY HILLS NSW, AU
Preston, WA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing and footwear for men and women, namely t-shirts, shirts, sweatshirts, pants, hats, jackets, overcoats, raincoats, ski pants, snow pants and footwear, excluding clothing for infants and toddlers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SMP CLOTHING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SMP (INTERNATIONAL) PTY LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SMP (INTERNATIONAL) PTY LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SMP (INTERNATIONAL) PTY LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Ride Snowboard Company
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SHY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 9, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |