USPTO serial 75539579
COMPLETING THE LINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMPLETING THE LINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and machine tools, namely automated assembly machines for manufacturing electronic products, namely, electronic components, circuit boards and plastic parts for the electronics industry and parts therefore, namely, in-line production cells, assembly cells, final assembly cells, modular production cells, labeling cells, multifunction cells, odd-form PCB assembly cells, pin insertion cells, soft beam soldering cells, soldering cells, test fixtures, test cells and components therefor; electric motors and engines not for land vehicles, machines, namely conveyors and parts therefore, namely, destackers, flip units, LIFO/FIFO buffers, magazine loaders, line unloaders, overhead conveyers, turn units, walk through conveyors; machines and machine tools, namely assembly robots for electronic products, electronic components, circuit boards and plastic parts for the electronics industry, and material handling and feeding equipment for the electronics industry and parts therefore, namely soldering heads, vision systems comprising electronic cameras, computers and machine and vision software, PCB preheating units, servo grippers, tool changers, tap detectors, and dual tap routers sold as a unit; and agricultural implements, namely incorporators and incubators for eggs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 9, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |