USPTO serial 75539835
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Minneapolis, MN
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business marketing consulting services in the field of marketing plans, market research, marketing communication plans, logo identity, database marketing, product and company positioning. new product development, marketing strategy, market scouting, marketing brochures and flyers, marketing via web site strategy and development, web site banner advertisements, publicity, newsletters, direct mail campaigns, sales and telemarketing training, prospect list generation, marketing via catalogs, customer segmentation, drafting marketing communications, project management, and interim marketing | ACTIVE | Nov 20, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |