Drawing for EMERGE MARKETING

USPTO serial 75539835

EMERGE MARKETING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EMERGE MARKETING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay A. Lipe

JAY A LIPE10 S WACKER DR STE 2300CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business marketing consulting services in the field of marketing plans, market research, marketing communication plans, logo identity, database marketing, product and company positioning. new product development, marketing strategy, market scouting, marketing brochures and flyers, marketing via web site strategy and development, web site banner advertisements, publicity, newsletters, direct mail campaigns, sales and telemarketing training, prospect list generation, marketing via catalogs, customer segmentation, drafting marketing communications, project management, and interim marketingACTIVENov 20, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 9, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Dec 18, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 27, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance