USPTO serial 75540278
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CHARLOTTE, NC
Charlotte, NC
CHARLOTTE, NC
CHARLOTTE, NC
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, AN ELECTRONIC TRADING PLATFORM ALLOWING USERS TO TRADE SECURITIES, CURRENCIES, AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS ON LINE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR RECORDING, RESEARCHING, ANALYZING, DATABASE MANAGEMENT, AUTHENTICATING, CALCULATING, EXECUTING, TRADE MATCHING, CREDIT AND RISK EVALUATION OF DATA IN THE FINANCIAL AND INVESTMENT INDUSTRIES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 1999 |
| 036 | FINANCIAL AND INVESTMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, RESEARCH, ANALYSIS, MANAGEMENT, CONSULTATION, AUTHENTICATION, CALCULATION, EXECUTION, TRADE MATCHING, CREDIT AND RISK EVALUATION; AND PROVIDING, RECEIVING, AND PROCESSING FINANCIAL AND INVESTMENT INFORMATION BY ELECTRONIC MEANS VIA COMPUTER NETWORKS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |