USPTO serial 75540524
PLAY TONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 10, 2005
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with PLAY TONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA, US
Los Angeles, CA, US
Los Angeles, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony M. Keats
Anthony M. Keats Keats Gatien, LLP9100 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 210WBeverly Hills, CA 90212United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | paper or cardboard articles and printed matter, namely, [ cardboard, ] stationery, [ mounted and/or unmounted photographs, series of fiction and non-fiction books in the field of science, newspapers for general circulation, general feature magazines, comic books, calendars, ] notebooks, memopads, [ pens, ] pencils, stickers, [ erasers, pencil sharpeners, pencil cases, staplers, ] playing cards, writing paper, envelopes [ , paper weights, paper coasters, paper mats, drawing rulers, postcards and trading cards ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2026 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 2, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 2, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 11, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 11, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 9, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |