Drawing for THE ART OF CORPORATE DEFINITION

USPTO serial 75540794

THE ART OF CORPORATE DEFINITION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2601445Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 30, 2002
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE ART OF CORPORATE DEFINITION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035trademark monitoringEXPIREDFeb 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2013CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
Aug 21, 2008C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jul 22, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Jul 8, 2008815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
Jul 8, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 17, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jul 30, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 4, 2002CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
Jun 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 13, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jul 31, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Mar 22, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Feb 1, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Oct 4, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 10, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 8, 2000PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Apr 11, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 17, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 17, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 25, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 26, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 18, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance