USPTO serial 75541430
DRYZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 6, 2001
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DRYZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
H.H BROWN SHOE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
GREENWICH, CT
H.H BROWN SHOE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
GREENWICH, CT
H.H BROWN SHOE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
GREENWICH, CT
Omaha, NE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Chen
David Chen IP Attorneys Group LLCSuite 3A57 Plains RoadMilford, CT 06841Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | DEODORIZING SPRAY FOR FOOTWEAR | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by H.H BROWN SHOE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by H.H BROWN SHOE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by H.H BROWN SHOE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Columbia Insurance Company
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named DRYZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 14, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |