USPTO serial 75541588
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FORCE, INC.
Atlanta, GA
Other trademarks owned by INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FORCE, INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FORCE, INC.
Atlanta, GA
Other trademarks owned by INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FORCE, INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FORCE, INC.
Atlanta, GA
Other trademarks owned by INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FORCE, INC.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Employment agency services for temporary or permanent staffing in the field of software design and information technology, and employment outsourcing services in the field of software design and information technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 25, 2001 |
| 042 | Designing software for others and providing consulting services in the field of software design and information technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 25, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2000 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 11, 2000 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |