CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FORCE

USPTO serial 75541588

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FORCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2750647Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 12, 2003
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FORCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEVEN J. WADYKA

STEVEN J WADYKA GREENBERG TRAURIG1750 TYSONS BLVD STE 1200MC LEAN, VA 22102-4232UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Employment agency services for temporary or permanent staffing in the field of software design and information technology, and employment outsourcing services in the field of software design and information technologySECTION 8 - CANCELLEDOct 25, 2001
042Designing software for others and providing consulting services in the field of software design and information technologySECTION 8 - CANCELLEDOct 25, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2010C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jul 8, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 12, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 12, 2003CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
May 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2002SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 23, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2002PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Jul 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jun 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 14, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 28, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 28, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 5, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 4, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 9, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2000PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 20001.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
May 11, 20001.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Jan 28, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 5, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance