USPTO serial 75542269
AIRBOSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AIRBOSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH GIORDANO
JOSEPH GIORDANO TELCORDIA TECHNOLOGIES INC1A-138R 445 S STMORRISTOWN, NJ 07960-6438UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for monitoring and controlling wireless and mobile communication services; computer software for monitoring and controlling wireless and wireline access to a global computer information network; computer software for monitoring and controlling telecommunications services, namely, electronic mail services, facsimile services, wireless access to web sites, storing and forwarding data, voice recognition services, voice messaging services; and instruction manuals sold with the aforesaid goods as a unit | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 26, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |