Drawing for SPIRAL SOFT

USPTO serial 75542603

SPIRAL SOFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, LAVERNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPIRAL SOFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT B KENNEDY

ROBERT B KENNEDY KENNEDY, DAVIS & HODGE, LLP5 CONCOURSE PKWY NE STE 900ATLANTA, GA 30328-7101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020PILLOWS FOR USE IN HOSPITALITY, INSTITUTIONAL AND MEDICAL FACILITIESACTIVEJan 26, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 11, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 24, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 30, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 7, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 28, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 30, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 1999AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 6, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance