Drawing for Serial No. 75543697

USPTO serial 75543697

Serial No. 75543697

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75543697?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LEESA N. WEISS

LEESA N WEISS JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded CD-ROMs and computer software in the fields of electronic commerce, digital and/or electronic product distribution, management of intellectual property rights in and to digital and/or electronic products, auditing of product distribution and sales, namely, software used for managing, processing and facilitating financial and online transactions, managing credit and debit card transactions, procuring, sourcing and fulfilling product and service orders, and for enhancing computer program security, namely, encryption, certification, authentication, data privacy and data integrity; and magnetic data carriers sold blankACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Jun 24, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 19, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 27, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 9, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 29, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2000DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 24, 2000DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance