Drawing for WILDFLOWER SEDUCTIVE RETRO-ROCK

USPTO serial 75543748

WILDFLOWER SEDUCTIVE RETRO-ROCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
Law office
TRADEMARK ASSISTANCE CENTER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WILDFLOWER SEDUCTIVE RETRO-ROCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Wildflower as a series of pre-recorded compact discs and audio cassettes featuring sound, music and imagesACTIVEMar 23, 1998
016Wildflower on paper, namely, on posters, cardboard, unmounted art drawings, painting and photographic reproduction on paperACTIVEMar 23, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 8, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 8, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Oct 19, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Sep 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 13, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Sep 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 10, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 16, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 16, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 6, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 6, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 6, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jul 3, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Jun 4, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Feb 14, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Jan 10, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 10, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 18, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 6, 2001PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED
Mar 5, 2001PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED
Feb 21, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 2, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jun 2, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Mar 24, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 10, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance