USPTO serial 75543748
WILDFLOWER SEDUCTIVE RETRO-ROCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TRADEMARK ASSISTANCE CENTER
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WILDFLOWER SEDUCTIVE RETRO-ROCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wildflower as a series of pre-recorded compact discs and audio cassettes featuring sound, music and images | ACTIVE | Mar 23, 1998 |
| 016 | Wildflower on paper, namely, on posters, cardboard, unmounted art drawings, painting and photographic reproduction on paper | ACTIVE | Mar 23, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |