USPTO serial 75543754
GOLDEN RETRIEVERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2000
- Examiner
- DONNELL, RICHARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GOLDEN RETRIEVERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHELLE L. VISSER
MICHELLE L. VISSER RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVENUE, SUITE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fancy Publications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Fancy Publications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Bowtie, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GOLDEN RETRIEVERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 14, 2010 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 23, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |