USPTO serial 75543877
NUT CRACKER ALE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUT CRACKER ALE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer, ale, and malt liquor | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |