Drawing for NUT CRACKER ALE

USPTO serial 75543877

NUT CRACKER ALE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NUT CRACKER ALE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward Marquette

EDWARD MARQUETTE SPENCER FANE BRITT & BROWNE LLP1400 COMMERCE BANK BLDG1000 WALNUT STKANSAS CITY, MO 64106-2140

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beer, ale, and malt liquorACTIVENov 30, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 30, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 30, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 2, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 4, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 20, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 2000PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 12, 1999PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance