USPTO serial 75544443
ONE PRICE SELLING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONE PRICE SELLING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James Phillip Chandler
JAMES PHILLIP CHANDLER THE CHANDLER LAW FIRM10621 RIV RDPOTOMAC, MD 20854UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper, namely, writing paper, memo paper and bond paper; cardboard; printed matter, namely books, magazines, brochures and pamphlets in the field of marketing of goods; cloth, tape and wire for bookbinding; unmounted and mounted photographs; stationery; instructional and teaching materials in the field of marketing of goods; plastic materials for packaging goods, namely bubble packs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |