Drawing for ONE PRICE BUYING

USPTO serial 75544444

ONE PRICE BUYING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
COGGINS, ROBERT H
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONE PRICE BUYING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Paper, namely, writing paper, memo paper and bond paper; cardboard; printed matter, namely books, magazines, brochures and pamphlets in the field of marketing of goods; cloth, tape and wire for bookbinding; unmounted and mounted photographs; stationery; instructional and teaching materials in the field of marketing of goods; plastic materials for packaging goods, namely bubble packsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 24, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 25, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 21, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Aug 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 16, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jun 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 11, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 28, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 20, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Mar 8, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Sep 30, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Sep 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 27, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 26, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 7, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance