USPTO serial 75544527
DAIRYCAL MILK CALCIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DAIRYCAL MILK CALCIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
COTTEE DAIRY PRODUCTS PTY. LIMITED
New South Wales 2072, AU
Other trademarks owned by COTTEE DAIRY PRODUCTS PTY. LIMITED
COTTEE DAIRY PRODUCTS PTY. LIMITED
New South Wales 2072, AU
Other trademarks owned by COTTEE DAIRY PRODUCTS PTY. LIMITED
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | CALCIUM FORTIFIED POWDERS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL USE FOR PURPOSES OF STRENGTHEN BONE MASS; CALCIUM ENRICHED INFANTS AND INVALIDS FOODS; CALCIUM TABLETS IN THE NATURE OF DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS; MEDICATED CHEWING GUM; FOOD SUPPLEMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | MILK; CALCIUM ENRICHED DAIRY PRODUCTS EXCLUDING ICE CREAM, ICE MILK, AND FROZEN YOGURT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COTTEE DAIRY PRODUCTS PTY. LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by COTTEE DAIRY PRODUCTS PTY. LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named DAIRYCAL MILK CALCIUM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |