USPTO serial 75544846
IT ADVISOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2844084Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 18, 2004
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IT ADVISOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK B. HARRISON
MIRIAM R KARLIN INTERNATIONAL DATA GROUP INC5 SPEEN STFRAMINGHAM, MA 01701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING EDUCATIONAL SEMINARS RELATING TO COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, ONLINE SERVICES, HIGH TECHNOLOGY, COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INFORMATION SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 18, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |