USPTO serial 75545018
MUSIC.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOKOLS, GWEN P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MUSIC.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERNEST D. BUFF
ERNEST D BUFF RIKER, DANZIG, SCHERER, HYLAND, ET ALONE SPEED AVEP O BOX 1981MORRISTOWN, NJ 07962-1981Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing a web site information relating to music business | ACTIVE | Aug 10, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |