Drawing for SOLUTIONS IN SIGHT

USPTO serial 75545184

SOLUTIONS IN SIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SOLUTIONS IN SIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JONATHAN E. MOSKIN

JOHATHAN E MOSKIN PENNIE & EDMONDS LLP1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics for eyes, namely eye cream, eye gels, eye shadow, eye makeup remover, eye makeup, eye pencils, eyebrow pencilsACTIVE—
005contact lens cleaning solution, eye lubricating drops, vitamins, herbs, and food supplementsACTIVE—
009optical wares and eye care products, namely, computer eyeglasses, computer screens, compute goggles, spectacles, eyeglass lens, eyeglass frames, eyeglass cases and pouches, eyeglass bands, sunglasses, binoculars, microscopes, telescopes, safety goggles, sports goggles for use in basketball, football, baseball, skiing, squash, tennis, cycling and soccer; and night vision gogglesACTIVE—
029non-alcoholic beverages, fruit drinks and sports drinksACTIVE—
030teas, breakfast cereals, processed herbsACTIVE—
035retail store services featuring eye wear and optical wares and eye care productsACTIVE—
038interactive consumer health information in the field of eye wear and optical wares and eye care productsACTIVE—
041educational services, namely providing seminars in the field of eye careACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 19, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 27, 2002ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance