USPTO serial 75546890
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Eastleigh, Hampshire S050 9NW, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Epstein
MICHEAL A EPSTEIN WEIL GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP767 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10153-0023UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and electronic equipment, namely transmitters, receivers, encoders, decoders, integrated receivers and decoders, demultiplexers, modulators, demodulators, transport stream processors, transport stream combiners, signal monitors and alarms, transceivers, analogue to digital converters, and digital to analogue converters, all of which are for use in connection with transmitting, receiving, encoding, decoding, enciphering, deciphering and securing radio, television, data, audio, video and information signals broadcast over cable, satellite, microwave and terrestrial channels; computer software for the purpose of encoding, decoding, encrypting,, decrypting, displaying, receiving, transmitting, and processing video, audio, data and control signals; electronic encrypters, decrypter, deciphers and deciphers for the purpose of encrypting, decrypting, enciphering, deciphering, and securing video, audio, data and control signals. electronic programme guides, telextext, videotext and closed captioning processors and controllers or the purpose of receiving, transmitting, processing, displaying, data information; computer keyboards, remote control hand-sets, computer visual display units, computer printers, computer controllers, computer monitors and screens, all of which are for use with data processing, telecommunications and broadcasting networks and installations; smart cards incorporating programmable electronic memories, smart card readers, smart card identifiers and smart card writers; electronic memories, electronic processors, tapes, cassettes and disks, all of which are used for the recording, storing, logging, displaying, editing, receiving, securing, transmitting, interacting with and reproducing and preventing reproduction of sound, images and data; computers, computer cards and electronic processors, all of which are used for the management, performance analysis and diagnosis of broadcast systems and telecommunications networks and circuits; electronic signal controllers, filters, schedulers, monitors, measurers and managers; amplifiers and alternators used for processing, coding and decoding electronic, radio frequency and optical signals and data; computers, computer cards, computer software and electronic processors, all of which are used for electronic financial transactions, electronic trading, access to the global computer network and to private and global telecommunications networks; and video, audio and data databases recorded on electronic, magnetic, electro-magnetic, optical and electro-optical media | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |