USPTO serial 75548099
SMARTSERVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTSERVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James C. Scheller, Jr.
JAMES C SCHELLER JR BLAKELY, SOKOLOFF, TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WIISHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | global positioning systems hardware and software, namely gps circuits, hand-held receivers, antenna, modems, transmitters, processors, mobile receivers, ground station receivers, satellites, base station systems in the nature of computer servers and relays, network of reference gps receivers, operating software for use therewith, and gps software in the nature of navigation, location, tracking, mapping and timing software; telecommunication systems in the nature of satellites, wireless handsets, receivers and gps technology incorporated therewith for use in a wireless network | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | communications services and telecommunications services namely using global positioning systems to provide for navigation, location, tracking, mapping and timing objectives for users; providing the electronic transmission of data and voice via global communications network and wireless networks; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; electronic transmission of voice messages and data by telephone or network communications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 29, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |