Drawing for SMARTSERVER

USPTO serial 75548099

SMARTSERVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTSERVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James C. Scheller, Jr.

JAMES C SCHELLER JR BLAKELY, SOKOLOFF, TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WIISHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009global positioning systems hardware and software, namely gps circuits, hand-held receivers, antenna, modems, transmitters, processors, mobile receivers, ground station receivers, satellites, base station systems in the nature of computer servers and relays, network of reference gps receivers, operating software for use therewith, and gps software in the nature of navigation, location, tracking, mapping and timing software; telecommunication systems in the nature of satellites, wireless handsets, receivers and gps technology incorporated therewith for use in a wireless networkACTIVE
038communications services and telecommunications services namely using global positioning systems to provide for navigation, location, tracking, mapping and timing objectives for users; providing the electronic transmission of data and voice via global communications network and wireless networks; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; electronic transmission of voice messages and data by telephone or network communicationsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
May 30, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 29, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Dec 21, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Oct 27, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 27, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 17, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 4, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 4, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance