Drawing for MAKING GOOD DRUGS BETTER

USPTO serial 75553380

MAKING GOOD DRUGS BETTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LUTHEY, LYNN A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAKING GOOD DRUGS BETTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DIANE L. GARDNER

DIANE L GARDNER MASTERMIND IP LAW PC421 SANTA MARINA CTESCONDIDO, CA 92029UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Liposomes and liposome encapsulated compounds for use in the manufacture of pharmaceuticalsACTIVE
005Medical goods, namely a drug delivery device in the nature of an implanted or topical aggregation of liposomes providing timed-release of encapsulated pharmaceuticals made to the order or specification of others for treatment of a wide variety of diseasesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 5, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Dec 31, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 26, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 17, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 26, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 17, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 20, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 26, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 3, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 14, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 12, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 25, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 16, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 16, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Dec 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 20, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 8, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 7, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance