USPTO serial 75556192
XROADS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XROADS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH E GERBER
JOSEPH E GERBER WEINTRAUB GENSHLEA CHEDIAK SPROUL400 CAPITOL MALL ELEVENTH FLSACRAMENTO, CA 95814-4407UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Conducting sightseeing tours for others; arranging travel tours; tour guide services; conducting camping tours for others; arranging excursions for tourists; travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for transportation; chartering buses and vans; transport by buses, vans, sport utility vehicles, trains and ferries; and, arranging and conducting horseback, canoeing, rafting, mountain biking, hiking and houseboating expeditions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |