USPTO serial 75557391
WEBDIALOGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 30, 2004
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WEBDIALOGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WESTFORD, MA
WESTFORD, MA
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
ARMONK, NY
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
BILLERICA, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Bevilacqua
MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA HALE AND DORR LLP60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs for use in establishing live interaction sessions over local, national and global information networks; computer hardware, namely computer server | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 25, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WEBDIALOGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WEBDIALOGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NetDialogs, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named WEBDIALOGS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 22, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 19, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |