USPTO serial 75557896
MICROSILK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICROSILK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Spartanburg, SC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. Moose
RICHARD M MOOSE ATTORNEY AT LAW PADORITY & MANNINGP O BOX 1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | CLEANING CLOTHS, NAMELY, FABRIC WIPES MADE IN WHOLE OR IN SIGNIFICANT PART OF MICRODENIER POLYESTERS, USED IN COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 2, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 17, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |