USPTO serial 75562271
MDS PROTEOMICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MDS PROTEOMICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Etobicoke, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD J PARR
RICHARD J PARR BERESKIN & PARRKING ST W 40TH FL BOX 401PLZ, SCT M5H 3Y2SCOTLANDGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs for assays for the diagnosis of diseases, computer programs for chemicals markers for disease states, computer programs for performing diagnostics for diseases, computer programs for determining targets for drugs, computer programs for determining protein and peptide sequences; and scientific instruments, namely mass spectrometers, automated sample preparers for mass spectrometers, and parts and accessories for the foregoing, all for developing assays for the diagnosis of diseases, and for developing chemical markers for disease states, and for performing diagnostics for diseases, and for determining targets for drugs, and for determining protein and peptide sequences | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | scientific research, namely developing assays for the diagnosis of diseases; developing chemical markers for disease states; determining targets for drugs; determining protein and peptide sequences; and developing methodologies relating to the foregoing; and performing the foregoing services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |