USPTO serial 75562840
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SAN ANTONIO, TX
NEW YORK, NY
CHARLOTTETOWN, PEI, CA
CHARLOTTETOWN, PEI, CA
SPELL READ P.A.T. LEARNING SYSTEMS INC.
CHARLOTTETOWN, PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND, CA
Other trademarks owned by SPELL READ P.A.T. LEARNING SYSTEMS INC.
SPELL READ P.A.T. LEARNING SYSTEMS INC.
CHARLOTTETOWN, PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND, CA
Other trademarks owned by SPELL READ P.A.T. LEARNING SYSTEMS INC.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED MANUALS, BOOKS AND EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM MATERIALS, NAMELY, BOOKLETS, WORK SHEETS, WORK BOOKS, FLASH CARDS, READING CARDS; PRINTED PRE-DESIGNED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM MATERIALS UTILIZED IN A FORMATTED TEACHING PLAN FOR ENHANCING READING AND WRITING SKILLS; PRINTED TEACHING MATERIALS IN THE FORM OF PRINTED WORK BOOK GAMES, WORD LISTS; TEST; TEACHING AIDS, NAMELY, PRE-PRINTED ROTARY WHEELS, CHARTS, SYLLABLE SHEETS, ACTIVITY BOOKS; PRIMER, ALPHABET BOOKS, PRINTED ALPHABET MATERIALS, NAMELY,PLATES, SHEETS, FLASHCARDS, READING CARDS; TEACHING MATERIALS IN THE FORM OF EDUCATIONAL PAMPHLETS; DEVICE USED TO HOLD AND DISPLAY ALPHABET CARDS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 30, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |