USPTO serial 75566104
MAMUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAMUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KRISTEN H SORENSEN
KRISTEN H SORENSEN HUNTON & WILLIAMS200 PARK AVE 43RD FLNEW YORK, NY 10166-0136UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toys and sporting goods, namely, toy airplanes, stuffed toy animals, toy arrows, baby multiple activity toys, toy bakeware and cookware, toy banks, inflatable bath toys, bath toys, stuffed toy bears, and toy building blocks, and lacrosse ball bags, paddle ball games, ball pitching machines, billiard balls, footballs, lacrosse balls, playground balls, tennis balls, volley balls, beach balls, and bowling balls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |