USPTO serial 75566811
INFINITY CUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 25, 2001
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INFINITY CUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Electro Visual Engineering, Inc.
Hawthorne, NY
Electro Visual Engineering, Inc.
Hawthorne, NY
Electro Visual Engineering, Inc.
Hawthorne, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony H. Handal
Catherine R. Keenan Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | OPTICAL APPARATUS, NAMELY, FLIGHT SIMULATOR SCREENS; VISUAL DISPLAY SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF SCREENS, PROJECTORS, POLARIZERS, SPHERICAL BEAM SPLITTERS, AND BI-REFRIGENTS FOR PRODUCING A SIMULATED IMAGE; VISUAL DISPLAY SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF FOCUSING OPTICS FOR PRESENTING AN IMAGE OF AN OBJECT AT A DISTANCE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 3, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Electro Visual Engineering, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Electro Visual Engineering, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Electro Visual Engineering, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named INFINITY CUBE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 24, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |