USPTO serial 75567187
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A. Giangiorgi
RICHARD A GIANGIORGI TREXLER BUSHNELL GIANGIORGI & BLACKSTONE105 W ADAMS ST FL 36THCHICAGO, IL 60603-6299UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | BEAUTY CARE PRODUCTS AND COSMETICS, NAMELY, LOOSE POWDER, FOUNDATION, PRESSED POWDER, BROW DEFINE POWDER, CORRECTOR, CONCEALERS, LIQUID FOUNDATION, EYE SHADOWS, BLUSH, LIP SCRUBS AND LIP PRIMERS, LIQUID POWDER FOUNDATION, NAIL LACQUER, EYE PRIMER, LIPSTICKS, LIP GLOSSES, MOISTURE STICK, MASCARA, EYE PENCILS, LIP PENCILS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |