USPTO serial 75568184
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Wheat Ridge, CO
Wheat Ridge, CO
Wheat Ridge, CO
HELSINKI, FI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terence P. O'Brien
8700 W. Bryn Mawr Ave.CHICAGO, IL 60631UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Snow skis, and snowboards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 8, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 8, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 9, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |