USPTO serial 75568492
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CARSON CITY, NV
ABBOTSFORD, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
NAKED BOXER BRIEF CLOTHING INC.
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, ON
Toronto, ON
GOTEBORG, SE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rhett V. Barney
Rhett V. Barney Lee & Hayes PC601 W. RIVERSIDE AVENUE, SUITE 1400SPOKANE, WA 99201United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | [ MEN'S CLOTHING, namely, CAPS; ] [ T-SHIRTS, ] TOPS, [ TANK TOPS, JACKETS, PANTS, TROUSERS, JEANS, SHORTS; ] LOUNGEWEAR, [ ROBES, BATHROBES, ] PAJAMAS, BOXER SHORTS, UNDERGARMENTS, [ SWIMWEAR, BATHING TRUNKS; WOMEN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, CAPS; T-SHIRTS, ] TANK TOPS, [ CROP TOPS, BLOUSES, DRESSES, SKIRTS, PANTS, JEANS, COATS, ] LINGERIE, BRAS, [ UNDERGARMENTS, UNDERGARMENT THONGS, BUSTIERS, CORSETS, ] CAMISOLES, CHEMISES, NIGHTGOWNS, PEIGNOIR SETS, TEDDIES, PAJAMAS, ROBES, BATHROBES, [ SWIMWEAR, BATHING SUITS, BEACH THONGS ] | ACTIVE | May 9, 2009 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 2022 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 14, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 13, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 9, 2016 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 9, 2016 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | CCON | COUNTERCLAIM OPP. NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 25, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 29, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 12, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |