USPTO serial 75571823
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin A. Cahill
KEVIN A CAHILL WERTZ MCDADE & WALLACE945 FOURTH AVESAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer user interface software for use in wireless communications products and equipment, and instruction manuals and documentation sold as a unit; personal information management software for use in wireless communications products and equipment, and instruction manuals and documentation sold as a unit; web browser software for use in wireless communications products and equipment, and instruction manuals and documentation sold as a unit; email management software for use in wireless communications products and equipment, and instruction manuals and documentation sold as a unit; database management software for use in wireless communications products and equipment, and instruction manuals and documentation sold as a unit; video control software for use in wireless communications products and equipment, and instruction manuals and documentation sold as a unit; audio control software for use in wireless communications products and equipment, and instruction manuals and documentation sold as a unit; power management software for use in wireless communications products and equipment, and instruction manuals and documentation sold as a unit; call processing software for use in wireless communications products and equipment, and instruction manuals and documentation sold as a unit; interface management software for use in wireless communications products and equipment, and instruction manuals and documentation sold as a unit; test services software for ruse in wireless communications products and equipment, and instruction manuals and documentation sold as a unit; activity logger software for use in wireless communications products and equipment, and instruction manuals and documentation sold as a unit; product development and testing software for use in wireless communications products and equipment; Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) debug tool software and test harness software; electronic apparatus, namely printed circuit boards or cards and parts therefore; telecommunications reference designs, namely hardware and software designs and drawings, interface requirements, verification test results, calibration algorithms, specifications, schematics, production and assembly test plans and documentation, and printed circuit boards | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |