USPTO serial 75581352
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CHICAGO, IL
CHICAGO, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Interactive Coupon Marketing Group, Inc.
Chicago, IL
Other trademarks owned by Interactive Coupon Marketing Group, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith A. Vogt
KEITH A VOGT NIRO SCAVONE HALLER & NIRO181 W MADISON ST STE 4600CHICAGO, IL 60631UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ON-LINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR CREATING AND POSTING SAVINGS OFFERS ON A WEB PAGE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 30, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 16, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |