Drawing for ROP

USPTO serial 75583188

ROP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ROP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul E. Fahrenkopf

PAUL E FAHRENKOPF BARNES & THORNBURG750 17TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-4607UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Roll-over prevention sensors, valves and monitors for land vehicles with or without trailers; said sensors, valves and monitors also being part of electronic brake and chassis control monitors and controls for land vehicles, particularly commercial motor vehiclesABANDONED
037Repair and maintenance of electrical, electronic measuring, control and closed- loop-control apparatuses for level control, driving and braking systems for land vehicles and trailersABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2002ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jul 12, 2002OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jul 12, 2002OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Apr 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 14, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Oct 24, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Sep 18, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 26, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 20, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 23, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jan 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 26, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Sep 18, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 27, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 3, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance