Drawing for VSS

USPTO serial 75584370

VSS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BENZMILLER, ANDREW
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VSS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CARL M DAVIS II

ERIC J CARLSON FOLEY & LARDNER777 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202-5300UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009video cameras, video recording equipment, and video monitoring equipment, for use in motor vehiclesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2003PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Sep 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 14, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Sep 24, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Sep 9, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 13, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 13, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 21, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 18, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 14, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 27, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 28, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance