USPTO serial 75593060
D-TECTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with D-TECTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
INDANAPOLIS, IN
INDANAPOLIS, IN
BOEHRINGER MANNHEIM CORPORATION
Indianapolis, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Sue Michael
M SUE MICHAEL BOSE MCKINNEY & EVANS LLP135 N PENNSYLVANIA ST STE 2700FIRST INDIANA PLZINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical apparatus, namely, an optical screening device for noninvasively measuring optic lens fluorescence from glycosylated end products and glycosylated protein in the eye of individuals potentially having diabetes, primarily for use by optometrists and ophthalmologists | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed instructional materials and brochures relating to diabetes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by BOEHRINGER MANNHEIM CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named D-TECTOR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 29, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |