USPTO serial 75593510
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
1204 Geneva, CH
1204 Geneva, CH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Weinstein
DAVID A WEINSTEIN1600 BROADWAY STE 2600DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Ingots of precious metals, medals, and monetary coins | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 21, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |