USPTO serial 75595508
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
40545 DUSSELDORF, DE
40545 DUSSELDORF, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis K. Ebling
LOUIS K EBLING FROST & JACOBS LLP2500 PNC CTR201 E 5TH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202-4117| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs, namely, for use in database management in the field of insurance, investment, financial and stock related services | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, mounted and unmounted photographs, stationery, and instructional and teaching materials, except apparatus, for use in seminars, schools, universities, and in-house education | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Insurance services, namely, insurance brokerage, insurance claims administration, insurance underwriting, and insurance consultation; investment services, namely, funds investment, real estate investment, investment consultation, and investment management; financial services, namely, mortgaging of securities for others, automated securities brokerage, agencies in the field of bonds and other securities, mortgage banking, mortgage brokerage, and mortgage lending; real estate services, namely, real estate appraisal, leasing of real estate, real estate brokerage, real estate listing, real estate management, real estate syndication, real estate agencies, real estate time sharing, real estate escrow services and real estate trustee services | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Real estate development and real estate site selection | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 5, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 1999 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |