Drawing for HV

USPTO serial 75595508

HV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Louis K. Ebling

LOUIS K EBLING FROST & JACOBS LLP2500 PNC CTR201 E 5TH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202-4117

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs, namely, for use in database management in the field of insurance, investment, financial and stock related servicesACTIVE
016Printed matter, namely, mounted and unmounted photographs, stationery, and instructional and teaching materials, except apparatus, for use in seminars, schools, universities, and in-house educationACTIVE
036Insurance services, namely, insurance brokerage, insurance claims administration, insurance underwriting, and insurance consultation; investment services, namely, funds investment, real estate investment, investment consultation, and investment management; financial services, namely, mortgaging of securities for others, automated securities brokerage, agencies in the field of bonds and other securities, mortgage banking, mortgage brokerage, and mortgage lending; real estate services, namely, real estate appraisal, leasing of real estate, real estate brokerage, real estate listing, real estate management, real estate syndication, real estate agencies, real estate time sharing, real estate escrow services and real estate trustee servicesACTIVE
037Real estate development and real estate site selectionACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 5, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 13, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 24, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 18, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Sep 17, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jun 25, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 4, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 3, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Nov 28, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 28, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Feb 23, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 12, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 4, 1999AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Feb 5, 1999AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance