USPTO serial 75600026
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
S-151 85 Sodertale, SE
S-151 85 Sodertale, SE
SE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
IRVING N STEIN
WILLIAM R HANSEN DUANE MORRIS LLP380 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10168UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PAMPHLETS, LEAFLETS AND BROCHURES ON MEDICAL, HEALTH AND PHARMACEUTICAL DRUG-PRODUCT TOPICS; PRINTED INSTRUCTIONAL AND TEACHING MATERIAL IN THE FIELD OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 12, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |