Drawing for ADAPTABILITIES

USPTO serial 75600227

ADAPTABILITIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADAPTABILITIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Judith L. Grubner

JUDITH L GRUBNER LAFF WHITESEL & SARET LTD401 N MICHIGAN AVE STE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020office furnitureACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 23, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 23, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Sep 6, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jul 14, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 13, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Dec 14, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 14, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance