USPTO serial 75601018
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristine M. Boylan
Kristine M. Boylan Merchant & Gould P.C.P.O. Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Toothpastes for cosmetic purposes, non-medicated dental gels, non-medicated oral spray and non-medicated chewing gum for the prevention and treatment of tooth decay, tooth sensitivity and periodontal disease and dentifrices | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Toothpastes for medicinal purposes, dental gels for the prevention and treatment of tooth stains, oral spray and chewing gum for the prevention and treatment of tooth decay, tooth sensitivity and periodontal disease, mouthwash for medicinal purposes and dental wax | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research and development services for others in the field of dental care and providing dental care for others in the field of dental care for others | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |