USPTO serial 75603285
E.PEOPLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E.PEOPLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea Van Kampen
ONE PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINT PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, MAGAZINES AND NEWSPAPERS AND SECTIONS AND COLUMNS THEREOF AND SUPPLEMENT THERETO AND JOURNALS, NEWSLETTER, PAMPHLETS, BROCHURES, INDICES AND CATALOGUES FEATURING INFORMATION ON COMPUTERS, COMPUTING, COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTER NETWORKS AND NETWORKING, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, COMMUNICATIONS, COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY, DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY, HIGH TECHNOLOGY, ONLINE SERVICES, COMPUTER AND VIDEO GAMES, FINANCE, NEWS, EDUCATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |